17 April 2023

Monday 17 April 2023: Attitude to Affinity Water

Monday 17 April 2023: Attitude to Affinity Water

On a scale of 0 to 10, how satisfied/dissatisfied am I with Affinity Water?

Why?

First, I feel politically deeply challenged by what ought to be a public utility instead in the hands of commercial interests. Affinity Water is a commercial company owned by an insurance and asset management company, an investment company and a fund management company. It would strain credibility to suggest that the primary focus of these three companies is not money. The privatisation of public water was 'sold' to the public primarily on the basis that the new water utility companies would raise large amounts of money for major infrastructure projects. The major infrastructure projects never happened, and the large sums of money borrowed were distributed to shareholders instead. Now, thirty years later, the water companies have been instructed to do something about the appalling state of the water infrastructure in the UK, and to pay for this the water companies want to increase water charges. This was not how we were told it was going to be.

Two analogies occur to me. The first, simple, is being asked how satisfied or dissatisfied I feel about a person who picked my pocket. The second, more complex, is returning home to find that my house has been sold by someone who had no legal right to sell my house, having stolen my title deeds, and pocketed the value of the house that had been legally mine. The new owners permit me to continue living in the house, but they have taken out a massive loan against the value of the house. I am most dissatisfied with the person who stole the title deeds to my house, but I am also dissatisfied with the person who now owns the house that was stolen. (N.B. This scam really does happen.)

Second, to my knowledge, Affinity Water has no plans to undertake a full and timely renewal of the water mains for which it is responsible. This means that, like the other water companies, Affinity Water will forever be responding to leaks. The water wasted as a result of leaks is enormous.

Third, Affinity Water is not serious about reducing customer wastage of water. The UK is rushing headlong into a future of severe water stress, and customer water use reduction targets are pitiful. I cannot help but imagine that when the business model is to make a profit by selling water to customers, the last thing that you want the customer to do is to use less water. Affinity Water has not put all of its customers (who can be) on water meters. I have a water meter, but I want a smart meter so that I do not have to traipse out to the road every day. The principal mechanism that will allow customers to reduce water use is to see and understand precisely how much water they are using on a daily or even an hourly basis, and to charge them less for using less water.

However, fourth, Affinity Water does reliably supply me with clean water. However, so did the water board before it was privatised.

Fifth, Affinity Water has good drought plans (which I have read). I also like the fact that Affinity Water is now in discussion with other water companies regarding the very long overdue movement of water around the UK. However, this is the sort of thing that would not have been a novel development before the privatisation of water. 

Outside of the Water Community and what we’ve shared with you, have you seen any communications from Affinity recently, e.g. advertising, information with bills etc.? If so, what was it?

E-mails encouraging me to take ever shorter showers (the ideal being, it would seem, not to shower at all), to test the pans of the several (three) toilets in my house to find out if any suffers from invisible water leakage from the cistern, and to buy remarkably expensively (but discounted and therefore representing a bargain) water butts with kits to collect water from roof gutter downpipes. (I require the water from a full water butt every day in order to water my vegetable garden alone, and double that in order to irrigate the fruit trees in my orchard. However, as we are no longer in receipt of summer rainfall, once a water butt has been emptied, and of which I already have several, it can be months before it is refilled.)  

03 April 2023

Monday 3 April 2023: Utility companies digging up the road again

Monday 3 April 2023: Utility companies digging up the road again

Imagine that there is a leak running down the side of a reasonably busy main road. It's not flooding the road, but it is streaming constantly along the gutter and will require digging up part of the road to fix. ​

Please could you tell us what you think the steps and processes are for getting this leak fixed and to complete the roadworks? Please think of everything, starting from the leak initially being reported, to the leak ultimately being repaired.​

I have little doubt that this exercise will show how lamentably ignorant I am with regards both to practical issues and to legal and bureaucratic procedures.

Step 1: The leak needs to be visible, to be spotted, and to be taken notice of by someone who may generally be considered nosy and interfering. I am one of those people, and typically report pot-holes in the road, and unlit street-lights, to the local authority.

Step 2: If there is no indication that the leak is being attended to, then said busybody needs to report the leak to the relevant water companies: plural because where I live Affinity Water supplies the fresh water and Southern Water attempts to manage the waste water. I would not be confident about identifying accurately whether a small leak was fresh water or waste water. I would use an online water leak service, although in the past I have telephoned a water company directly.

Step 3: The contacted water company would then need to investigate, first of all establishing whether the leak is fresh or waste, thereby determining which company should take the matter forwards.

Step 4: The 'responsible water company' would then have to establish where the leak is. This may not be easy because where water comes to the ground surface may be distant from where the leak from the water pipe is.

Step 5: Having established where the leak is, the water company would have to determine whether the leak is beneath public or private land. From this information, they could need to be clear whether the leak was, indeed, their responsibility. There may be three scenarios: the leak may be their responsibility, and beneath public land; the leak may be their responsibility but beneath land that is privately owned; the leak may be the responsibility of the private land owner. The underground water pipe network is extensive, and pipes pass under roads, footways, parks and fields, and people's gardens. For example, with building-infill, a house might not have existed when a water main was first laid, or maybe a water main spur had to be laid across someone else's garden.

Both ownership and jurisdiction may be unclear and would need to be established.

Step 6a: If the leak is beneath private land, and the responsibility of the land owner, the water company would need to establish who owned the land. In my own case, the leak was beneath my driveway and therefore my responsibility (£££). Every two years, contractors contracted to UK Power Networks knock on my door to ask who owns the fields either side of my property. Their wish is to access the power lines that cross the two fields, but they are required first to ask permission of the land owner. Fortunately for them, I have got used to answering those questions, otherwise I imagine that the process could take them weeks.

Step 6b: If the leak is beneath public land, such as a public road (there are one or two private roads round here), then I guess that the local authority will have to be notified.

Step 7: At some point, an engineer will need to make some kind of initial assessment about the size of the leak. This assessment might take place when the underground location of the leak is identified. I assume that larger leaks take priority. On the other hand, I have seen instances of what was thought to be a minor leak requiring considerably greater attention and work than first assessed.

Step 8: If the leak is beneath a public road, as many are, then further contact will have to be made with the local authority with a view to closing a lane of the road, setting up traffic control measures, and specifying how long the water main repair is expected to take. At the same time there needs to be both an assessment of how much the repair is going to cost the water company, and when a repair team will be available. There then needs to be choreography with the local authority about the precise dates of the lane/road closure. I think that road closure may be more complex, as it usually requires the posting of public notices in advance of the closure, although I assume that a major water main burst (not the scenario of this exercise) could be attended to as an emergency.

Step 9: Assuming that the water mains will have to be turned off for the duration of the repair, all affected householders and businesses will have to be notified in advance, and if necessary arrangements put in place for an alternative supply of water (say, a bowker, or supplies of bottled water [which was the case in Challock, Kent, last summer]).

Step 10: This could be weeks after the nosy busybody (me) has reported the leak - engineers arrive with equipment to dig up the road/footway. However, this might be far from the end of the story. In North Road, in the city centre of Durham, the Victorian water main burst. Its repair required much time and equipment, as well as a very large hole. However, as soon as the hole had been filled in and the road surface restored, the leak recurred. Why, because the water main was so old and decayed that the sections of old cast iron pipe onto which the new polyethylene pipe had been grafted simply gave way. New holes had to be dug, more repairs effected, and the holes filled in. Until the same thing happened again and again. It was like a slow-motion Buster Keaton movie. Eventually Northumbrian Water accepted that the entirety of the water main under North Road had to be replaced. Although my memory is far from perfect, I think that the entire saga lasted between one and two years, impacting on the shops and businesses, and changing for good how the road was used by traffic and pedestrians. I might add that the huge water main network beneath UK cities, towns and villages is equally old, decaying apace, and I am unaware of any water company having methodical, comprehensive and timely plans to replace the network that they 'inherited' on privatisation, taking into account the expected lifespan of the relevant materials. (I should be happy to be pointed towards documents that show me to be incorrect.) I believe this to be a significant reason why there are so very many burst water mains.

Step 11: The road surface is 'made up', although in the case of Southern Water in my Kent village, remarkably poorly - the roadway (The Square and Duck Street) have looked a mess ever since. If the road has been closed, then the road is re-opened. The engineers pack up, and find out where they are off to next.

Imagine that Affinity Water has just started roadworks in your street…​

1. What would roadworks with minimal interruptions look like for you? How might this look and work in terms of the experience, timings, communication etc.​

Additionally, think about when there is planned engineering works on your road, how much notice/warning would you want, and why? ​

2. What kind of information do you think should be provided when there is roadworks planned?​

What kind of information do you think is absolutely essential? What kind of information could be optional and nice-to-have?

As it happens, Southern Water have just dug another hole in Duck Street (see previous response). A notice was posted a couple of weeks ago indicating that works would be taking place. I do not know whether the works have been planned to coincide with the school holidays, resulting in less traffic disruption. The location of the hole is not exactly convenient, and seeing as it was Southern Water that chose to position the sewage control facility in the middle of the road, instead of beside the road, the company is directly responsible for the inconvenience. There is a high visibility plastic barrier around the hole, and appropriate signage from both directions: 'road works', 'road narrows' and 'pass on the right/left'. This means that a pedestrian would have to be trying quite hard to fall down the hole, and that motorists have adequate warning and guidance. There is no need for temporary traffic lights. When there are road works on the Canterbury Road, it is often the case that temporary traffic lights are set up directly outside my house, and I have to put up with the throb of a diesel generator which I find extremely irritating (being highly sensitive to noise). On the subject of finding things irritating, I do not like hearing engineers shouting instructions to each other, and prefer it when they use walkie-talkies. I also dislike the discarded empty crisp packets and crumpled Greggs bags that are left after the engineers have packed up and gone.

Road closures are always seriously disruptive, and therefore undesirable. It is obviously valuable to have good warning of a planned road closure. I am never absolutely sure if being alerted to an impending closure of the Canterbury Road and then finding out that the road closure never took place, is much of an improvement over the road being closed. This failure to close the road happens periodically, and surprisingly often.

Essential information includes start and end dates for the road works, along with starting and finishing times. This information allows me to plan my journeys. I like to know the purpose of road works but that is because I am nosy, and such information is not essential. On the other hand, good information about what to do should there be a problem when the site is unattended (such as at night) would be valuable. I have had to walk away from seeing problems (such as all the safety barriers having fallen into a trench - did they fall or were they pushed? or failed temporary traffic lights) because there was no information about to whom to report the problem. It is also helpful to indicate when such traffic controls are three-way instead of just two - I have seen impatient motorists on many occasions decide to drive through a red light because they have too quickly arrived at the conclusion that the traffic lights have 'got stuck', which can be incredibly dangerous.

We’d now like to share with you some context about what happens when we currently set up roadworks. When Affinity Water has to stop traffic in order to fix a leak or refresh a mains connection, they have to get permission from the council to do so. This process can take time, sometimes up to three months in order to get approval.

Specifically up to three months, no, I did not know this, but it comes as no surprise because for several years I had a lot of contact with administrative staff, including transport and planning staff, working for a local authority.

I should hope and expect that emergency work can be arranged with somewhat greater alacrity.

Does this information impact on me? No. My complaint is not the speed at which water companies address individual leaks, but the fact that there are so many leaks because there appears to be no programme or schedule of timely water main renewal.

Affinity Water can only send reminder texts or emails to customers who share their email addresses or phone numbers with us​

​How would you feel if you did not receive a reminder text/email prior to works starting on your road? Why would you feel this way?​

How useful would you find a notice board nearby to the roadworks, to feedback relevant information about the roadworks, as well as phone numbers and email addresses? Please tell us why this would/wouldn’t be helpful.

I think that the first question to ask is how would I feel about receiving an SMS text message or e-mail to alert me to local road works? I have never heard of such a thing. I should be very happy that I was being kept informed. I have no difficulty in giving my cellphone number and e-mail address to utility companies, and I know for certain that Affinity Water has my e-mail address (my house is in a not-spot – without a cellphone signal, and so SMS texts messages might arrive days later).

A road works notice board is a good idea, for the utility company to give information about what to do in the event of problems (as I wrote in a previous response).